There was a very interesting conference by Phil Agre on October 4th (yes that was some time ago) in Paris. I couldn’t attend, but was told about the content and I think the conference is worth mentioning. Agre promotes an entrepreneurial vision of personal development in society that I find very interesting.
Social and political theories tend to describe society as a static structure. In reality, each human being creates his/her own career through entrepreneurial processes: by creating relational networks and structures around emerging topics of interest. This creation is not limited to business, but is concerns all careers, be they professional, civic, artistic and scientific. Successful entrepreneurial paths require a particular type of cognition. According to Agre, the inegal distribution of this specific cognitive capacity lies at the source of many social problems.
This view is interesting in that it is a generalization of the concept of entrepreneurship way beyond the business area. In sum, we’re all the entrepreneurs of our life, and this ability matters more than institutions we might work with. Sartre would have said that in this view, existence precedes essence, and that we’re actually very much in control of the existence.
I exchanged emails with Phil, but he told me he hasn’t put his thougths about the topic into a paper yet. You can still visit his home page: http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/pagre
My other blog
Mon blog en français
Search my blog
Key wordsactive intertia andrew hargadon apple Artificial intelligence bill gates book review burgelman Business model business plan clayton christensen communism conference conflict of commitment creativity cross-boundary disrupters crossing the chasm decision making digital economy digital transformation digitization disruption disruptive innovation Disruptive technology don sull effectuation entrepreneurship explorer fail fast fast second firefox Forbes frames framing geroski Gillette how breakthrough happen incremental innovation innovation Innovation book Innovation management innovation process innovation squared innovator iphone ipod Jean-Paul Gaillard Jim collins John mullins Kodak leadership major innovation markides Marlboro microsoft nespresso Nestlé open source organizational decline Performance radical innovation reducing costs Sarah Kaplan schumpeter sense making sony strategic innovation strategy The balancing act of innovation the economist transformation uncertainty user experience value capture vlerick wal-mart
- Vive l’idiotie! Principe de vie à l’usage des entrepreneurs et des managers philippesilberzahn.com/2018/06/11/ent… https://t.co/qBYwnH4Ix7 5 hours ago
- Elles ne sont pas des research institutions; elles sont des publishing institutions. @O_Rollot twitter.com/rudyOrg/status… 8 hours ago
- ben non justement, c'est le propos de l'article; il n'y a pas besoin de formation pour utiliser un vélo. Qui aujour… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 8 hours ago
- RT @remigodeau: .@JeanTirole @leJDD (3): «Les licornes – ces entreprises nouvelles évaluées à plus d'un milliard de dollars – sont à 80% am… 9 hours ago
- Votre organisation a-t-elle besoin d’une raison d’être? philippesilberzahn.com/2018/04/30/fac… https://t.co/f7EGt9Bfu3 15 hours ago