Getting to plan B, by John Mullins and Randy Komisar, is an important book. In short, the thesis of the book is that successful startups very often had to change their initial business plan. To quote Mullins and Komisar: "If the founders of Google, Paypal or Starbucks had stuck to their original business plans, we'd likely never had heard of them." The startup process, largely driven by poorly conceived business plans based on untested assumptions, is seriously flawed. And the authors to give a few interesting examples of business plans changes that were successful. If only for this, the book is important because, despite many criticisms, business planning remains the cornerstone of entrepreneurship courses at business school, and well honed business plans are a must-have to pitch venture capital. The fact that no business plan survives the first encounter with reality seems to bother no one in industry. Importantly, the flaw does not lie in some limitations of the planners. In other words, it is not because of poor planners that business plans are useless, or even harmful. It is the very process of planning that is problematic. Behind the notion of planning lie the idea that to control the future, we need to predict it. However, recent research on entrepreneurship by Sarasvathy (see the concept of effectuation) showed that in uncertain environments, it is simply not possible to predict the future. Hence prediction is really a gamble.
Mon blog en français
Search my blog
Key wordsactive intertia apple Artificial intelligence book review burgelman Business model business plan clayton christensen conference conflict of commitment Coronavirus Corporate transformation creativity cross-boundary disrupters crossing the chasm decision making digital economy digital transformation digitization disruption disruptive innovation Disruptive technology don sull effectuation entrepreneurship explorer fail fast fast second firefox Forbes frames framing geroski Gillette incremental innovation innovation Innovation book Innovation management innovator innovator's dilemma iphone ipod Jean-Paul Gaillard Jeffrey Immelt Jim collins John mullins Kodak leadership Lean Startup Management of uncertainty markides mental model microsoft nespresso Nestlé organizational decline Performance radical innovation reducing costs Risk management Sarah Kaplan Saras Sarasvathy schumpeter sony strategic innovation Strategic surprise strategy The balancing act of innovation the economist transformation uncertainty user experience value capture vlerick wal-mart
- RT @rethinkecon: "Markets are arenas for social activity, and not only economic relationships are forged in that arena but often deep non-e… 1 hour ago
- RT @OlivierBabeau: Ma mère ne sait plus à quel saint se vouer. Elle ne jurait que par le bio. On avait réussi à lui faire croire que le bio… 5 days ago
- RT @emma_ducros: Astuce: si vraiment ton but est de faire de la littérature, la dernière chose que tu dois faire est d'engager une mère la… 1 week ago
- RT @HBRFrance: Votre #raisondêtre ressemble à celle de votre voisin ? Pire, vous êtes taxé de #purposewashing ? Pour exprimer avec sincérit… 1 week ago